@TOME V2.3
(Nov 2016)

Ref. - - Doc.
Global output mode :
Sort entries by :
Sequence Color type :

Show alignment :
Column output:
Score:

Alignment:

3D Common Core:

Structural Clustering:

Modeller Result :

Complexes Modeling
Templates Information:
Sequence & Result Tab:

Values color: [ Good | Correct | Middling | Bad ]Comparative Docking Tab: Displays ligands Score after transfer from template to model
Cell color: RMS between binding site of experimental template and receptor: [‹ 3Å | ‹ 10Å | › 10Å]
Result: [ Good | Correct | Acceptable | Bad | Empty = ligand not selected during the calculation step or result rejected ]

Query sequence : Lmo2654: (2016-04-06 )
MAREFSLEKTRNIGIMAHIDAGKTTTTERILFYTGRIHKIGETHEGASQMDWMEQEQERGITITSAATTAQWKGYRVNIIDTPGHVDFTVEVERSLRVLDGAVAVLDAQSGVEPQTETVWRQATTYGVPRVVFVNKMDKIGADFLYSVGTLHERLAANAHPIQLPIGAEDTFEGIIDLIEMNALYYEDDLGNDPHIKEIPADLKDLADEYRGKLVEAVAELDEELMMKYLEGEEITKEELKAGIRKGTLNVEFYPVVCGTAFKNKGVQPMLDAVLDYLPAPTDVPAINGVLPDGEEAARHADDSEPFSSLAFKVMTDPYVGRLTFFRVYSGTLNSGSYVQNSTKGKRERVGRILQMHANHREEISIVYAGDIAAAVGLKDTTTGDTLCDEKEQIILESMEFPEPVIQVAIEPKSKADQDKMGQALAKLAEEDPTFRAETDQETGQTLISGMGELHLDILVDRMRREFRVEANVGDPQVSYRETFRKSAQVEGKFVRQSGGRGQYGHVWIEFGPNEEGKGFEFENAIVGGVVPREYIPAVQAGLEGALDNGVLAGYPLIDIKAKLYDGSYHDVDSNEMAFKVAASMALRNAAKKCDPVILEPMMAVEVVIPEEYLGDIMGNITSRRGRVDGMEARGNAQVVRAFVPLANMFGYATHLRSGTQGRGVYTMQFDHYEEVPKSIAEEIIKANGGNNKED

Atome Classification :

(24 SA) Binding Score for complex ligand / Scwrl (Unconserved SChains Recalculated) model (Only selected ligand are displayed)
(Atome) (Ident) (Tito) (Num) (pKd) (Uniprot)

GDP_A_2(2BM1)
EFG_THETH
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_3(1FNM)
EFG_THETH
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_2(2BM0)
?
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_3(4M1K)
?
[Raw transfer]



GCP_A_2(2J7K)
EFG_THETH
[Raw transfer]



GDP_C_3(2EFG)
EFG_THET8
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_3(4M1K)
?
[Raw transfer]



G4P_A_5(4ZCM)
?
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_3(4MYU)
EFG_THETH
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_3(4MYT)
EFG_THETH
[Raw transfer]



GDP_A_5(4ZCL)
?
[Raw transfer]



G4P_B_9(4ZCM)
?
[Raw transfer]



GDP_B_9(4ZCL)
?
[Raw transfer]



GCP_A_2(3J25)
TET1_ENTFL
[Raw transfer]
21 PsiBlast_CBE 95.1378% -88 - C2 -2XEX - EFG_STAAU -
1 PsiBlast_PDB 92.5678% -88 * C2 *2XEX - EFG_STAAU -
105 HHSearch 87.9778% -40 - C- -2XEX - EFG_STAAU -
12 PsiBlast_PDB 87.4365% -84 - C2 -2BM0 6.2 ?
133 Fugue 87.2664% -87 - C2 -4M1K 6.2 ?
7 PsiBlast_PDB 86.9465% -87 - C2 -4M1K 6.2 ?
10 PsiBlast_PDB 86.1765% -82 - C2 -1FNM 7.2 EFG_THETH
9 PsiBlast_PDB 86.1665% -83 - C2 -4MYU 5.6 EFG_THETH
6 PsiBlast_PDB 85.9065% -80 - C2 -2J7K 7.2 EFG_THETH
2 PsiBlast_PDB 85.2365% -81 - C2 -2OM7 - ? -
8 PsiBlast_PDB 84.6665% -82 - C2 -2BM1 7.2 EFG_THETH
5 PsiBlast_PDB 84.3465% -75 - C2 -4MYT 5.3 EFG_THETH
13 PsiBlast_PDB 83.6465% -69 - C2 -3IZP - ? -
135 Fugue 79.9764% -81 - C2 -1ELO - ? -
3 PsiBlast_PDB 79.8665% -79 - C2 -2EFG 7.1 EFG_THET8
14 PsiBlast_PDB 79.6062% -65 - C2 -3J0E - EFG_ECOLI -
107 HHSearch 71.9435% -69 - C2 -2DY1 - ? -
17 PsiBlast_PDB 71.7634% -73 - C2 -2DY1 - ? -
16 PsiBlast_PDB 71.4934% -71 - C2 -1WDT - ? -
137 Fugue 58.2424% -50 - C1 -1N0V - EF2_YEAST -
22 PsiBlast_CBE 28.6840% -35 - C2 -4ZCM 5.9 ?
24 PsiBlast_CBE 28.0440% -40 - C2 -4ZCL 4.5 ?
23 PsiBlast_CBE 26.8140% -33 - C2 -4ZCM 5.3 ?
25 PsiBlast_CBE 25.2740% -31 - C2 -4ZCL 5.7 ?