@TOME V2.3
(Nov 2016)

Ref. - - Doc.
Global output mode :
Sort entries by :
Sequence Color type :

Show alignment :
Column output:
Score:

Alignment:

3D Common Core:

Structural Clustering:

Modeller Result :

Complexes Modeling
Templates Information:
Sequence & Result Tab:

Values color: [ Good | Correct | Middling | Bad ]Comparative Docking Tab: Displays ligands Score after transfer from template to model
Cell color: RMS between binding site of experimental template and receptor: [‹ 3Å | ‹ 10Å | › 10Å]
Result: [ Good | Correct | Acceptable | Bad | Empty = ligand not selected during the calculation step or result rejected ]

Query sequence : Rv3391: (2016-05-19 )
MRYVVTGGTGFIGRHVVSRLLDGRPEARLWALVRRQSLSRFERLAGQWGDRVRPLVGDLTELELSERTIAELGDIDHVLHCAAVHDTTWADATRAVIELAARLDATFHHVSSIAVAGDFAGHYTEADFDVGQRLPTPYHRMTFEAERLVRSTPGLRYRIYRPAVVVGDSRTGEMDTIDGPYYLFGVLAKLAVLPSFTPMLLPDIGRTNIVPVDYVADALVALMHADGRDGQTFHLTAPTAIGLRGIYRGIAGAAGLPPLLGTLPGFVAAPVLNARGRAKVLRNMAATQLGIPAEIFDVVGCAPTFTSDTTREALRGTGIHVPEFATYAPGLWRYWAEHLDPDRARRNDPLLGRHVIITGASSGIGRASAIAVAKRGATVFALARNGNALDELVTEIRAHGGQAHAFTCDVTDSASVEHTVKDILGRFDHVDYLVNNAGRSIRRSVVNSTDRLHDYERVMAVNYFGAVRMVLALLPHWRERRFGHVVNVSSAGVQARNPKYSSYLPTKAALDAFADVVASETLSDHITFTNIHMPLVATPMIVPSRRLNPVRAISAERAAAMVIRGLVEKPARIDTPLGTLAEAGNYVAPRLSRRILHQLYLGYPDSAAAQGISRPDADRPPAPRRPRRSARAGVPRPLRRLGRLVPGVHW

Atome Classification :

(31 SA) Binding Score for complex ligand / Scwrl (Unconserved SChains Recalculated) model (Only selected ligand are displayed)
(Atome) (Ident) (Tito) (Num) (pKd) (Uniprot)

NDP_H_8(1XKQ)
?
[Raw transfer]



NDP_E_5(1XKQ)
?
[Raw transfer]



NAP_G_7(1Q7C)
FABG_ECOLI
[Raw transfer]



NDP_F_6(1XKQ)
?
[Raw transfer]



NDP_G_7(1XKQ)
?
[Raw transfer]



NDP_G_7(1XHL)
?
[Raw transfer]



NAP_E_5(1Q7C)
FABG_ECOLI
[Raw transfer]



EDO_B_14(5HA5)
?
[Raw transfer]



EDO_C_24(5HA5)
?
[Raw transfer]



PEG_A_6(3OSU)
FABG_STAAM
[Raw transfer]



1PE_B_5(2PNF)
FABG_AQUAE
[Raw transfer]



1PE_A_6(2PNF)
FABG_AQUAE
[Raw transfer]



PEG_A_3(3OSU)
FABG_STAAM
[Raw transfer]



TNE_I_9(1XHL)
?
[Raw transfer]
65 HHSearch 89.6928% -88 - C1 -3TSC - ? -
75 HHSearch 87.5728% -91 - C1 -2CFC - HCDR_XANP2 -
74 HHSearch 84.4227% -93 - C1 -3GAF - ? -
73 HHSearch 81.6926% -86 - C1 -4FN4 - ? -
62 HHSearch 81.2826% -81 - C1 -2AG5 - BDH2_HUMAN -
64 HHSearch 80.5825% -86 - C1 -4G81 - ? -
76 HHSearch 80.0624% -89 - C1 -4URF - ? -
17 PsiBlast_PDB 78.8432% -79 - C1 -4IQG - ? -
26 PsiBlast_CBE 78.5732% -77 - C1 -1XHL 10.2 ?
71 HHSearch 78.1323%-100 - C1 -1MXH - ? -
12 PsiBlast_PDB 78.1127% -81 - C1 -2AE2 - TRN2_DATST -
3 PsiBlast_PDB 77.8933% -76 - C1 -2UVD - ? -
2 PsiBlast_PDB 77.6332% -74 - C1 -1XHL 3.4 ?
35 PsiBlast_CBE 77.5631% -75 - C1 -3AI3 - ? -
67 HHSearch 77.3225% -99 - C1 -3TZQ - ? -
48 Fugue 77.0924% -96 - C1 -1FMC - HDHA_ECOLI -
36 PsiBlast_CBE 76.8831% -76 - C1 -3AI3 - ? -
14 PsiBlast_PDB 76.7427% -81 - C1 -1IPF - TRN2_DATST -
59 HHSearch 76.5723% -90 - C1 -4RGB - ? -
37 PsiBlast_CBE 76.4931% -74 - C1 -3AI3 - ? -
38 PsiBlast_CBE 69.6531% -77 - C1 -1Q7C 6.3 FABG_ECOLI
39 PsiBlast_CBE 69.5031% -76 - C1 -1Q7C 5.2 FABG_ECOLI
15 PsiBlast_PDB 68.7735% -74 - C1 -1XKQ 7.8 ?
27 PsiBlast_CBE 67.4935% -73 - C1 -1XKQ 8.5 ?
40 PsiBlast_CBE 66.8931% -73 - C1 -2PNF 1.4 FABG_AQUAE
28 PsiBlast_CBE 66.8135% -73 - C1 -1XKQ 8.2 ?
41 PsiBlast_CBE 66.2831% -74 - C1 -2PNF 1.5 FABG_AQUAE
29 PsiBlast_CBE 64.9435% -71 - C1 -1XKQ 8.1 ?
19 PsiBlast_PDB 64.4030% -74 - C1 -3OSU 2.4 FABG_STAAM
45 PsiBlast_CBE 60.9931% -66 - C1 -5HA5 2.6 ?
46 PsiBlast_CBE 59.4231% -66 - C1 -5HA5 3.0 ?